Poorly discriminated VT by a single chamber defibrillator

Patient

This 53-year-old man received a Lumax 340 VR-T single chamber defibrillator for idiopathic cardiomyopathy and a depressed left ventricular ejection fraction. An event report (yellow color) was issued in the context of a classified SVT.

Main programmed settings

  • VF zone (limit at 260 ms) and VT1 zone (limit at 330 ms)
  • 12/16 cycles in the VF zone and 26 cycles in the VT1 zone were needed for the diagnosis
  • Maximum sensitivity programmed at 0.8 mV
  • VF zone: ATP one shot, followed by 8 shocks of maximum strength (40 J); VT1 zone: 3 bursts of ATP, followed by 3 ramps of ATP, followed by a single 10-J shock, a single 20-J shock, followed by 6 shocks of maximum strength
  • Effective discrimination in the VT zone  (onset = 20%, stability = 24 ms)
  • Pacing mode: VVI at 30 bpm


Trace

Remote tracing

The 3 channels available are 1) the markers with the time intervals, 2) the shock channel (FF =  far field) between the coil of the RV lead and the pulse generator, and 3) the right ventricular (RV) sensing channel.

  1. tachycardia with cycles hovering near the VT1 zone limit (330 ms);
  2. regular tachycardia;
  3. diagnosis of SVT in absence of sudden onset (value shown in the table = 5%). Since the SVT counter is twice the VT counter; 52 cycles (26 x 2) were needed to reach an SVT classification;
  4. persistence of the tachycardia hovering near the VT1 zone limit.

Comments

This patient presented with VT episodes, the rate of which oscillated around the lower limit of the tachycardia zone. The onset of the tachycardia is not visible, as it was slightly slower than the programmed zone. Consequently, the choice of rate of the VT zone has a direct influence on the quality of discrimination. The sudden onset criterion, designed to discriminate sinus tachycardia, prevents the treatment of tachycardias that accelerate gradually, on the principle that sinus tachycardia accelerates gradually, as opposed to VT that starts suddenly. This criterion is applied in initial classifications, though not in reclassifications. It may be the source of erroneous diagnosis in 2 types of patients: 1) those who develop VT upon exercise, where a clear demarcation between the rate of sinus tachycardia immediately preceding the VT and the VT rate is absent, and 2) those in whom, as illustrated here, the rate of the VT oscillates around the lower limit of the VT zone. These examples illustrate a) the limits of the use of a single criterion to accurately discriminate tachycardias, and b) the need to associate criteria.

In this patient, a change in the lower limit of the VT1 zone (to 400 ms) enabled an accurate classification and discrimination of the episodes and appropriate delivery of therapies.

X