Successful burst for repetitive episodes of VT
Tracing
Manufacturer Boston Scientific
Device ICD
Field Therapy
N° 7
Patient
This 39-year-old woman presenting with ischemic cardiomyopathy and old myocardial infarction received a Boston Science Teligen dual chamber defibrillator for secondary prevention of VT at rates between 130 and 140 bpm. She suffered an electrical storm with multiples episodes of VT treated with ≥1 sequence(s) of ATP.
Graph and trace
Summary 1
Episode of VT (discrimination V>A) at 140 bpm, treated with a single sequence of ATP.
Tracing 1
- sinus rhythm (AS-VS);
- tachycardia detected in the VT zone, starting suddenly, stable, though with a clear change in the morphology compared with sinus rhythm, particularly visible on the high-voltage channel. Atrioventricular dissociation (V>A) confirming the ventricular origin of the tachycardia;
- 8 out of 10 criterion fulfilled for the VT zone (V-Epsd);
- 10-sec Duration, throughout which the 6 out of 10 criterion remained fulfilled despite occasional VS classified cycles (sustained VT: V-Detect);
- burst of 10 complexes of ATP at fixed rate; RV pacing;
- successful burst and termination of the arrhythmia.
Summary 2
Second episode on the same day, requiring 2 bursts of ATP.
Tracing 2
- VT already on going (AV dissociation), though the ventricular rate was below the lower limit of the VT zone. The ventricular events were, therefore, labeled VS;
- slight acceleration of the tachyarrhythmia, entering the VT zone (VT). The tachycardia remained at the limit of the VT zone. Alternating VS and VT cycles;
- 8 out of 10 criterion fulfilled for the VT zone;
- 6 out of 10 criterion no longer fulfilled;
- 8 out of 10 criterion again fulfilled;
- the 6 out of 10 criterion remained fulfilled for the entire Duration;
- first burst of 10 complexes;
- after the burst, beginning of the redetection phase;
- 8 out of 10 criterion fulfilled;
- end of the Duration of redetection for the VT zone (programmed at 1 sec); no therapy delivered since the cycle was classified VS (V-Dur marker, since the 6 out of 10 criterion remained fulfilled);
- V-Detect marker on the next short cycle;
- second burst of 12 cycles at the same rate than previously;
- successful burst and end of arrhythmia.
Summary 3
Further similar episode, on the same day, requiring 6 then 3 bursts of ATP.
Tracing 3
- same VT as during earlier episodes;
- first burst of 10 cycles of ATP;
- unsuccessful burst;
- second burst of 12 ATP cycles; no change in the rate stimulation compared with the previous burst, though 2 stimuli were added;
- unsuccessful burst;
- third burst of 14 ATP cycles; 2 pacing stimuli were added compared with the previous burst;
- unsuccessful burst;
- fourth burst of 14 ATP cycles;
- unsuccessful burst;
- fifth burst of 14 ATP cycles;
- unsuccessful burst;
- sixth and last burst of 14 ATP cycles;
- unsuccessful burst;
- first ramp of 10 ATP cycles with a 10-ms decrement; the coupling between the first paced cycle and the last sensed ventricular event is the same as the coupling between the first 2 stimuli; thereafter, the coupling between the stimuli decreases by 10 ms;
- unsuccessful ramp;
- second ramp of 12 ATP cycles with 10-ms decrement; the shortest cycle (245 ms) is, therefore, 20 ms shorter than that of the previous ramp;
- unsuccessful ramp;
- third ramp of 14 complexes with 10-ms decrement; the shortest coupling interval (220 ms) is the shortest programmed paced cycle;
- successful ramp and end of the episode.
Other articles that may be of interest to you
EGM recordings
EGM recordings
EGM recordings
This tracing shows, once again, the value of ATP as a means of sparing the batteries of the device and preserving the patient’s quality of life. This patient had developed multiples episodes of VT that were successfully treated with a single or several pacing sequences. A first series of 6 bursts was programmed, followed by a series of ramps. The latter is not a systematic choice in this range of rates, given the risk of acceleration to a rapid polymorphic tachycardia by the more aggressive ATP. In this patient, approximately 70% of the bursts of ATP were successful, while the ramps terminated the remaining 30% of attempts, avoiding thereby the delivery of electrical shocks.